State Requirements
Reserve law in the United States is a patchwork. A condo board in Fort Lauderdale operates under some of the strictest reserve mandates in the country; an identical board in Dallas faces almost none. This guide maps the landscape — which states mandate studies, which mandate funding, and what governs boards everywhere else.
Reserve legislation has been moving fast since 2022 — always verify current statute text or consult association counsel before relying on any summary, this one included.
Tier 1 — Study and funding mandates. A handful of states require both periodic reserve studies and impose funding rules. Florida is the strictest: buildings of three or more habitable stories must complete a Structural Integrity Reserve Study every 10 years, and SIRS-component reserves can no longer be waived. (Full Florida breakdown.) New Jersey joined this tier with its 2024 structural integrity law requiring studies and adequate funding for covered associations. Hawaii requires associations to be at least 50% funded or on a plan to get there. Ohio requires reserve contributions of at least 10% of the annual budget unless owners formally waive it.
Tier 2 — Study mandates. Several states require studies (or formal reserve disclosures) but leave funding levels to the board. California anchors this group: Davis-Stirling requires a diligent visual-inspection study at least every three years, annual reviews, and detailed reserve disclosures to owners — though it doesn't dictate a funding level. (California details.) Nevada requires studies every five years with annual reviews; Utah, Washington, Oregon, Virginia, Delaware, and Maryland have study or disclosure requirements of varying strength.
Tier 3 — No mandate. The majority of states — including Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Arizona — have no statutory reserve study or funding requirement for most associations. That does not mean boards there are off the hook, which is the most misunderstood point in reserve law.
In Tier 3 states, three forces fill the statutory vacuum:
In practice, a board in a no-mandate state that follows Tier 2 behavior — current study, documented funding plan — has simply done voluntarily what California requires by law. The reserve study process and funding framework are the same everywhere; only the legal floor moves.
| State | Study Required? | Funding Rules? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | Yes — SIRS every 10 yrs (3+ habitable stories) | Yes — SIRS reserves non-waivable | Strictest in the nation post-Surfside |
| New Jersey | Yes — structural integrity law (2024) | Yes — adequacy requirements | Phased compliance deadlines |
| California | Yes — every 3 yrs + annual review | Disclosure only | Balcony inspections (SB 326) interact |
| Nevada | Yes — every 5 yrs + annual review | Adequacy standard | NRS 116 |
| Hawaii | Effectively yes | Yes — 50% funded or plan | Condo statute |
| Ohio | No | Yes — 10% of budget unless waived | Waiver by owner vote |
| WA / OR / UT / VA / MD / DE | Study or disclosure requirements | Generally no | Varies by community type |
| TX / GA / TN / NC / SC / AZ and most others | No | No | CC&Rs + fiduciary duty govern |
State-specific deep dives: Florida SIRS · California · Texas · Georgia — with New Jersey, New York, Arizona, the Carolinas, and Tennessee coming in this series.